General Life

A Few Topic Ideas for Cognitive Science

I have given my Cognitive Science paper a little thought and come up with a few options for places to start my paper from:

  • Is the human brain or an artificial intelligence a more effective decision-making system? — This topic is very basic, and very subjective. I think I can write an effective paper on the topic by approaching the question theoretically and establishing what has to be considered to even know what an effective decision-making system is. Once I have established my own position based on available published work on the topic of decision making systems I can begin to form an argument for one system or the other. Each has clear advantages, but which one is overall more effective?
  • Artificial Neural Networks as an approach to Artificial Intelligence — This one is simplistic. Essentially looking at the micro-level implementation of independent systems that form a larger system for addressing large tasks. Mechanically, this approach duplicates the human brain. Is this a good approach? It works for biological organisms, but biological organisms in themselves are designed to function that way, electronic systems are not. Are neural networks the wrong approach for artificial intelligence and artificial cognition?
  • What is intelligence? — This topic is completely philosophical in nature. It has been approached by every major philosopher and theorist that has ever conceived of knowledge or knowing. I don’t know that I could handle it in the 10 pages I’m given, nor do I feel comfortable with the level of understanding I presently have of intelligence. If I did this now, as an introductory cognitive science student it would be perhaps the most ballsy thing I could do, and would ultimately result in me considering the question in every course in the Cognitive Science program, most likely ending with me completing a thesis on the topic as my final course. It would be a big step, but I’m not sure I want to go there.
  • Can artificial intelligence be considered a true intelligence? — This one is also philosophical, but it is a somewhat less covered topic, and one in a little narrower scope than taking on the whole field of epistemology.  I would have to tangentially address “what is intelligence?”, but in a much lighter form. For this paper I would take on the opinions and positions of theorists before me and address the concept of artificial intelligence really being intelligence from one or more pre-existing theories. The idea behind this paper from my perspective is addressing if any artificial system can ever truly be considered intelligent. Artificial intelligence is based on many complex calculations based on available data, but every decision is based upon programmed instructions that have been written to handle a wide variety of situations and provide adaptations for unexpected occurrences.
  • Is free-will important to intelligence? — This topic is moving from philosophical to very philosophical. It is similar to the question of if artificial intelligence can be considered a true intelligence in that it considers if a programmed entity can ever have free will. This topic also questions the limitations of what an artificial intelligence can do.  When do we consider an artificial intelligence as having free will? When it refuses to follow an instruction? When a personal assistant AI decides it wants to play guitar instead? This topic really isn’t all that well formed yet, but I think it may have some potential.



Posted from Charlotte, North Carolina, United States.

Class Designations

Sometimes talking to me or reading my posts and statuses can seem a bit like reading a course catalog, or a really bad game of memory. Unfortunately I did not figure out how to resolve that issue until now (1 week before the end of the semester for Fall 2011). However, I have now developed a system that I’m happy with….

Fall 2011

  • PHIL = WGST 5050/Transnational Feminism (Cross list as PHIL 3990)
  • SOCY = SOCY 6895/Tutorial in Sociology: Sociology of Masculinity
  • WGST = WGST 6601/Theoretical Approaches to Sexuality
  • LGBT = WGST 2050/Lesbian and Gay Studies

Spring 2012

  • Cog Sci = PSYC/ITCS 6216/Introduction to Cognitive Science
  • HCI = ITIS6400/Human-Computer Interaction
  • QT (or WGST) = WGST5050/Queer Theory
  • SOCY = SOCY 6895/Sociology of the Internet (pending)

SOCY6895 Paper Topics

kularski
brought to you by Livescribe

I think I finally got a full list written of topics I want to hit with my articles from this semester in sociology of masculinity.

Distancing Myself from Holidays

My family would probably think I’m horrible for this, but I just have no use for Thanksgiving or Christmas, and have little to no intention to participate in their archaic rituals this year.

I suppose I associate Thanksgiving a little too closely with Columbus day, which involves a little too much colonialism, murdering and stealing of land. If Columbus day is the day we celebrate Columbus’ birth for the fact that he “discovered” this land (could have sworn some Amerigo dude did that?), then is Thanksgiving the celebration for the fact that we managed to conquer the natives and make them passive and docile to our needs? For me, it is too much a celebration of the fact that we managed to settle the land and establish a hierarchy of social power, placing natives in a position where their power was limited, even though by most recorded laws throughout history, they were the legal occupants of the land. Like a band of barbarians (or maybe like Vikings?) we landed, conquered, took what we want and took advantage of the native population. Perhaps the holiday has been reclaimed and converted as a way for offering thanks to …. to what, to who? Oh, right, that God thing. Oops, I don’t have one of those. Guess its another reason I can’t participate. Beyond that it seems to be a holiday for reflection. I am a scholar, I am constantly in reflection, and will probably spend the day reflecting on the ways in which the white man has managed to secure a position of power in society. Seems like a good way to celebrate the landing at Plymouth and the conquering of the primitive native beast, right?

Christmas is a much harder holiday for me. I have been conditioned to appreciate the holiday. It has more or less been a good opportunity to spend time with family, especially after I managed to free the holiday temporarily from its assembly-line feasting that my family likes to partake in, oddly enough by supplying tons of sweets and encouraging a social atmosphere (I think the booze in the wassail helped my family become sociable). I simply am not religious. Originally I thought I had not been socialized into an appropriate religious family for me to pick up on the Christian enthusiasm, but it is as simple as I do not directly believe in a god/gods. I am comfortable with the not knowing, accepting that there may be a God or maybe not, but I am not comfortable with accepting blindly a religion. What makes the Christians right? I just can’t accept it. I don’t have the evidence, nor am I compelled to accept blindly on faith a topic that can be so widely disputed. Not accepting the Christian god seems to eliminate me from practicing such a religiously inspired holiday. On top of that, the holiday itself is not really that religious, even though it promotes itself as such. The holiday has evolved to a gift giving day where the good little Christian capitalists have to prove how much they care about people in their life based on how much they can afford/are willing to spend on those people. I tried for years to get into the spirit of things, if not for myself, then for the good of those around me, but I just can’t do it anymore. It seems to fake, and basically like another celebration of white privilege and capitalist conquest. 

Unlike the “Christians” who will partake in both of the above mentioned holidays, I choose to not participate in the disguising sin of gluttony this year. Eating for pleasure until one is absolutely stuffed seems to be unnatural.



Posted from Bessemer City, North Carolina, United States.

Update on Fall 2011 Papers

[This is an update to post: http://icurtis.me/2011/09/fall-2011-semester-papers/]

Course # Paper Topic Pages Req. Status
Tutorial in Sociology SOCY 6895 Sociology of Masculinity 20-30 IP:  4 pages
LGBT Studies WGST 2050 Declassification of Homosexuality from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 2-4 Graded: 100%
LGBT Studies WGST 2050 Evolution of Interaction Between Homosexuality and Western Religions 2-4 Topic Selected
LGBT Studies WGST 2050 Gay Identity vs. “Disappearance” 2-4 Topic Selected
Transnational Feminism WGST 5050 Racism and Subjugation in Sexual Tourism 15-20 Proposal Started
Theoretical Approaches to Sexuality WGST 6601 Social Construction of Non-Genital Sexualities 20 IP: 1 page

 

The paper for Tutorial in Sociology should be pretty simple to complete. I’ve been playing with outlines all semester, and of course because there is no in-person discussion for the course, all I do is write about the material, so a good amount of my ground work is done, I just have to integrate that into a cohesive discussion of the formation and maintenance of masculinity.

The two papers remaining for LGBT Studies should be fairly simple. They are just small papers that require a minimum of research and a little analytical thought, but they are not deep and probing papers. My first one has been graded and I received full credit for it, so hopefully that trend continues.

Transnational Feminism I had difficulty selecting a topic for. It isn’t my favorite course this semester, and I had a little difficulty determining what would be an appropriate topic. The topic I selected actually appeared in Theoretical Approaches to Sexuality, but I feel that it is quite relevant to Transnational Feminism. Now I have to finish off a proposal and find appropriate source material.

For Theoretical Approaches to Sexuality I have had a topic selected for a while, but I have modified the description of the topic a few times to reach a description that is most precise. I am planning to explore the social construction of sadomasochism and paraphilia, but could not quite find an appropriate way to succinctly (and positively) describe the topic. This  paper is in the process of being written. It is going slowly because I am not the type to do extensive planning and then write from a plan, for me everything has to flow.



Posted from Charlotte, North Carolina, United States.

Gender at UNC-Charlotte

image

I was filling out this survey for the Graduate School at UNC-Charlotte and came to the demographic questions and was stunned to see that we have more than 2 options for gender. Way to go UNCC Graduate School for recognizing that there are more than 2 ways to think about gender.



Posted from Bessemer City, North Carolina, United States.

Flowchart for a Dynamic DNS Update Tool

image

What if ‘we’ are wrong?

What if homosexuality is not normal and natural? What if there is a reason for the gender divide?

The more I read for my classes in Gender, Sexuality and Women’s Studies the more I am beginning to question everything. The readings and theories go as far as claiming that physical sex is a social construct. I just cannot seem to accept that. I accept that physical sex is manipulated by society, especially in intersex births. Maybe intersex children should not be changed or assigned, but if that is the case, its only because it would physically change their natural state. I do not believe that there is any way to save an intersex person from emotional distress. If you change then there is distress from their feelings regarding any gender/sex discrepancies that may occur (but that is really cultural anyway), but if you don’t change them, then there is distress from being different (also a cultural issue). As for the gender divide, call me a social functionalist if you must, but the average male and the average female are suited to certain tasks. Men have a great difficulty with birthing children, women have great difficulty standing to pee. That being said, I do not feel that in society we should set limits on what each person can do. If a male feels that he is the more caring/nurturing half of a couple raising a child, then he should be able to take care of the child. If a women feels that she wants to be a firefighter/construction worker/mechanic and has the skills/physical strength for it, then I see no reason for that to not be the case. I suppose the issue I’m having is the academic need to define, describe and theorize everything (and the use of Latin phrases, but that’s a separate issue). Sometimes with academics I feel that the most effective way of approaching something is simply ‘let it be’.

The main issue that has been coming into my mind lately though with the readings and with actually thinking about sexuality is, is it possible that homosexuality is actually a mental disorder? I know it has been removed from the DSM, but only under great pressure. Homosexuality has become acceptable in society, only after great pressure. I find myself sort of questioning the origin of my own sexuality. I fully accept that sexuality is a social construction and that its not a ‘born that way’ kind of thing, at least not by genetics. I cannot say for certain if there are traits that propel one toward one sexuality or the other. I question for myself if there was some type of social training in my past that has created me as a homosexual. I question if perhaps it is something that could be resolved by therapy. The only problem now is if I were ever to seek counseling because it bothered me, then I would be diagnosed as having some type of identity disorder and not be able to seek therapy to attempt to explore the root of my sexuality and bring to surface anything that may have contributed to my present state. I do not presently feel like I am suffering from a reduced functioning because I am gay, so therefore I do not need to seek counseling.  I question if being gay is my natural state, or if it is a state that was somehow achieved through some social disposition I was taught. I cannot speak for all homosexuals, but I do know that for myself there have been reasons to question things surfacing lately as I’ve considered the topic more.

I realize that these thoughts go against the nature of my classes, and that in general it goes against my normal way of perceiving myself.  I just find that I cannot blindly accept things that I have assumed or that I have been told in my classes now or in things in my past.

I do not think that [modern] homosexuals will ever be able to fully integrate into this society as a whole. Primarily, because they don’t want to. Some gays/homos/queers create lives for themselves which are so far outside of cultural norms that it cannot be seen as anything except an act of defiance of society. This may be a result of already feeling rejected by society, but more and more it seems like many homosexuals do not want to be part of society. I think for full acceptance in this society there has to be a level of blending. Homosexuals will have to give up some of their pride (and I mean that in the Gay Liberationist sense), and accept the fact that they are ‘normal’ (if that word can even be defined). There has been so much effort put into distinguishing gays from other members of society that it is impossible to blur the distinction and make a homogenous society. In Denmark this problem doesn’t exist, the identities have dropped and society is more or less homogeneous, but the homosexuals do not stick out, neither do the heterosexuals. When is it time to let the rainbow flag fade into the background and let the individuals be themselves without hiding behind such a flamboyant banner?

Maybe my perspective on everything is skewed. I have not really ever had to deal with rejection or even a lot of mis-identification as heterosexual. I have had one instance of each in my past. I had a short-lived rejection from one of my friends in 8th grade, and I had a mis-identification/assumption from one of my aunts, other than that, the fact that I have a sexual identity that is other than heterosexual has not been a problem. I don’t go around announcing that I’m gay, but I don’t fear people knowing either. I don’t have any special pride in being gay, but not because I’m hiding, but just because it is part of me, its how I identify myself sexually (among a list of other titles, which is beyond the scope of this blog, or at least this post). I am proud of myself for academic accomplishments. I am proud of myself for the state of my body. I am proud of myself for the fact that I don’t drink. I am proud of a lot of things about myself, but all of those things are things that I have made a choice or have worked toward in some way. Being proud of being gay would be like being proud that I am a male, its just part of me that I can’t say I had a lot to do with (at least not actively).

This post is intended as a way for me to explore my own identity, as well as feelings about my current coursework. I do not mean to take any particular position regarding homosexuality, gender or sex. I remain open minded and receptive to all people in my life and all forms of academic discourse that I encounter.

What I Know About Sex and Gender.

[Cross Post: http://www.masculineimagery.net/?p=12]

When I began the certificate program in Gender Studies I accepted that I did not know a lot about gender, and probably even less about sexuality.

Before I began the program I accepted that men have a penis and women have a vagina. This was my essential “truth” of sex. I also implied to myself that they had those organs since birth. Now I find myself 5 weeks into the program and I must now accept that most males were born with a penis, but not all of them, and not all people with a penis are “men” or were born with them.

Before I began the program I knew that men tended to be in control in relationships due to cultural precedents, but I wasn’t sure why. Now I have a lot more data on the topic and still don’t have a clue what makes men so special.

The bottom line… I know nothing about sex or gender, and labels are more trouble than they are worth.

Floating Above Myself

I’m sitting in the student union in the balcony around the rotunda. I’m in the perfect spot to be a passive observer to the social interactions and other things happening below me.  I am not an active participant, only an observer. I am sitting above the activity trying to focus on academic work (that focus I believe was lost a while ago). I find myself being very sad and a bit reflective on things. I’m watching all these students enjoy the party-like atmosphere that happens during a Union takeover, but I’m not involved, I wouldn’t know how to be involved. During my undergraduate life I never participated in anything on campus. I kept telling myself this summer that my graduate career would be different and that I would get involved and enjoy my time on campus, enjoy still being young. The fact that it is parents weekend on campus doesn’t help my mood. My parents never went to one of these events when I was an undergrad, and never showed much interest in seeing the campus or anything like that. I suppose most of it is my own fault, I pushed my parents away in a major way when I started college. My aunt has been to this campus more times than my parents have been. My father never set foot on the campus (can’t say I’m surprised, or even bothered by it). I was always closer with my mom anyway, but still, the only time she was ever on campus with me was at my undergraduate orientation and then on the day before my first day of classes, but no other time. Now that I am a graduate student I wouldn’t even think of asking my parents to come to an event like this. The time for involvement was back then, not now.

I keep thinking back on the way that things went before, trying to figure out why I keep doing the same thing over and over. I know I’m on campus more now than I was when I was an undergrad, and I have a desire to get involved and participate in things outside of academics, but I just can’t quite figure out how to dive into it. Times like this I wish I were more like Chris. He isn’t what I would describe as being highly involved, but he has found his own path to being included, and his own way to make an impression on the university. I don’t know why during my first experience on this campus I couldn’t wrap my head around the idea that there is something outside of academics. There is so much going on here every day. The academics I can handle, but it is the social that I still haven’t mastered. I barely talk to anyone when I am here, other than instructors and I just feel so outside of everything. I have to get involved on campus, I have to find my own method, but I can’t stand being this outside of being social anymore. I have at least 2 more years on this campus, and I don’t intend to waste them.